Another Catastrophic Contagion: The Same Procedures Again?
For years the pharmaceutical industry has been suspected of being an immensely influential lobby, with a tendency for capital interests superceding any concern for the creation of the best possible cures. That impression became increasingly strong in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this has not been the first time that a drug scandal – such as the thalidomide drug in the 1960s, for example – shook public confidence. Currently, there are growing concerns about the instrumentalisation of pandemics and dangerous side effects of mRNA vaccines.
In order to be able to throw a medical preparation onto the market at lightning speed, little by little it is coming to light what failures were made by drastically lowering the requirements for vaccine production and approval, if one can speak of a vaccine in the classical sense at all. Notwithstanding that demographic intentions regarding a population reduction are difficult to prove – considering state vaccination coercion and the excessive demands for vaccination on the one hand, and the exorbitant profits of the pharmaceutical companies on the other – it is difficult to deny that this is at least a lucrative (albeit immoral) business model. Politicians agreed to gagging contracts at the taxpayers’ expense which, according to the German magazine Die Welt, are tantamount to a “licence to print money”. Accordingly, the European Union ordered a total of 4.2 billion vaccine doses under the decisive initiative of EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which would correspond to about eight vaccinations per capita in relation to the population of the EU.
mRNA Gene Therapy as Standard Vaccination
In spite of all the vaccination campaigns and state pressure, a considerable part of the population was sceptical about the new mRNA injection. This attitude was soon confirmed by numerous inconsistencies, so it is hardly surprising that the lobby system in question has been striving to fine-tune its business models in order to keep it all going. That is exactly what is currently happening in an almost perfidious way. On the one hand, the pharmaceutical lobbies and their henchmen and backers are evidently striving to make mRNA gene therapy the standard form fo vaccination. For example, at the beginning of this year, a combination vaccine developed by BioNTech and Pfizer, which is to be used in future to vaccinate against COVID-19 and influenza simultaneously, was approved by the US Food & Drug Administration for an accelerated approval procedure. Furthermore, Moderna had recently announced updates on its industry-leading mRNA pipeline, stating that it has 48 programmes in development, including 36 programmes in clinical trials, which include mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases and mRNA therapeutics for seven different modalities. A new mRNA injection for the treatment of heart patients was even announced. Henceforth, has been recommended to explicitly ask for the mechanism of action for each vaccination.
The Next Pandemic to be Deadlier & Affect Children?
No less disturbing nor downright frightening, however, are the predictions regarding another future pandemic. This is especially true in view of the fact that several years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the two-year scenario that most of us had suffered from the beginning of 2020 to the beginning of 2022 was almost exactly described in the German Parliament´s document 17/12051 of the 3rd January 2013. Moreover, months before COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, a simulation of what we had experienced was carried out under the direction of Bill Gates and the World Health Organisation as part of the so-called “Event 201“. A comparable procedure had also taken place not too long ago that had also gone largely unnoticed. “Catastrophic Contagion” is the name for the upcoming “health policy” agenda of the establishment – or, in other words, the next chapter of a new potential health dictatorship. Under the aforementioned working title, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in collaboration with the WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted the exercise for the next pandemic at the annual Grand Challenges meeting in Brussels, Belgium last autumn. They planned on how to respond to an epidemic that spreads in one part of the world and subsequently becomes a global pandemic with a higher mortality rate than COVID-19. It has also been predicted that such a hypothetical future pandemic would also disproportionately affect children and young people in general. Did protecting the vulnerable group of the over-80s perhaps not represent a sufficient incentive in taking a vaccine?
Virus Development for the Purpose of Vaccination
After the majority of forecasts regarding COVID-19 turned out to be inaccurate, all the alarm bells started ringing when statements in sparse transcripts read that, „given great scientific uncertainty and possible political resistance, decisive and courageous measures are to be implemented“. Moreover, it also appears that the next time that a global pandemic arises, the powers that be will not limit themselves to lockdowns alone, but will rather make far more intensive use of censorship than before. These powers further agreed that countries should give priority to increasing the resilience of the population against misleading information and to the curbing of the spread of harmful misinformation. They even „baptized“ the future virusas Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS). After what we had experienced in the two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative – despite all accusations of alleged conspiracy theory – to be vigilant. An essential principle surrounding future vaccines will be reversed by no longer developing vaccines against viruses, but rather the contrary, which are viruses for vaccines.
Sascha A. Roßmüller
ETN Vice Chairman